Huge: Military Reverses Deployment Rather Than Defend Obama's Citizenship

Jim Condit Jr. Earthhope Action Network



Editor's note: Please scroll down to watch the video. This is amazing and I love the way the military is standing up for the Constitution and for America. This does say that we are in a crisis, though, does it not?.

I've hesitated to publish this (Major Cook story) until I could definitely verify it - so many of the stories in the press spent all the time throwing attempted brickbats (really marshmallows) at combat veteran Major Stefan Frederick Cook and his attorney Orly Taitz - and no time explaining clearly what was going on.

One of the stories I am relying on is: Bombshell: Orders revoked for soldier challenging prez, as World Net Daily (despite my disagreement with them on policy questions and outlook) does not publish false or unverified facts, as far as I know.

Most of you have heard - but in case some haven't: Army Major Stefan Frederick Cook was scheduled to be deployed to Afghanistan. He filed suit asking to see proof that the man sitting in the White House, Obama, is really a US citizen. Cook said he wanted to make sure that he was receiving a lawful order, -- as his military oath precludes him from following unlawful orders.

Cook wanted to make sure he was following the order of the President of the United States, and not some man sitting in the White House who was not eligible to be President of the United States.

MILITARY BACKS DOWN IN TWO DAYS!

GUESS WHAT? The military, two days later, revoked the order sending Cook to Afghanistan - rather than go into court to defend Obama's citizenship. This is HUGE, as they say.

This means that the military high command (for now under the control of the enemies of the USA) is conceding that they cannot prove that Obama is a citizen.

The YouTube featuring a 7 minute live interview with Major Cook and Orly Taitz AFTER THE DEPLOYMENT ORDERS WERE REVOKED can be found here:



Call me with any questions at 531-741-2095.

Jim Condit Jr.
513-741-2095
PO Box 11339
Cincinnati, Ohio 45211

http://www.wagthedog2010.com
http://www.YourOption.info
http://www.votefraud.org
Youtube.com/JimConditJr
Network America

Source: Earthhope Action Network
.

---

Comment at Earthhope Forums

Executive Order 13489: It's Unconstitutional, as Are All Executive Orders

by Margie Laupheimer Earthhope Action Network



Some are suggesting that Obama is off the hook concerning his lack of an authentic birth certificate because he wrote Executive Order 13489. This is what I say.

There is nothing in the Constitution that gives the president the authority to write executive orders. Here is what the president is allowed to do. as written in Article II Sections 1. - 4. of the Constitution.

Read it and you'll see that the president has very few powers. Some of them are strong in themselves but the number of them is quite limited and writing laws is not one of them.

The very idea of a president being able to issue decrees for his own protection from the Constitution is a declaration, not only of guilt, but of dictatorship.

(Article continues below)


Shop Earthhope Magazines

An executive order makes decrees as if they were law but according to the Constitution only Congress has the power to write federal law.

Here is Executive Order 13489 Section 2.

Executive Order 13489 Section 2 Wrote:

Sec. 2. Notice of Intent to Disclose Presidential Records. (a) When the Archivist provides notice to the incumbent and former Presidents of his intent to disclose Presidential records pursuant to section 1270.46 of the NARA regulations, the Archivist, using any guidelines provided by the incumbent and former Presidents, shall identify any specific materials, the disclosure of which he believes may raise a substantial question of executive privilege. However, nothing in this order is intended to affect the right of the incumbent or former Presidents to invoke executive privilege with respect to materials not identified by the Archivist. Copies of the notice for the incumbent President shall be delivered to the President (through the Counsel to the President) and the Attorney General (through the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel). The copy of the notice for the former President shall be delivered to the former President or his designated representative.
(b) Upon the passage of 30 days after receipt by the incumbent and
former Presidents of a notice of intent to disclose Presidential records,
the Archivist may disclose the records covered by the notice, unless during that time period the Archivist has received a claim of executive privilege by the incumbent or former President or the Archivist has been instructed by the incumbent President or his designee to extend the time period for a time certain and with reason for the extension of time provided in the notice. If a shorter period of time is required under the circumstances set forth in section 1270.44 of the NARA regulations, the Archivist shall so indicate in the notice.

The only one who can do anything about this is us. Congress won't act. I doubt the Supreme Court will accept the case.

It's up to us and it's way past time. Every day we waste throws us deeper into dictatorship and Nazi America.

What do you all say about this?

Source: Earthhope Action Network

Comment at Earthhope Forums